9.03.2007

War

Directed by: Philip G. Atwell
Starring: Jet Li, Jason Statham, John Lone, Devon Aoki, Luis Guzmán, Saul Rubinek, Mathew St. Patrick, Nadine Velazquez
Running Time: 1h 43min

Truly unmemorable film starring two great action stars who have given us much better work. War is a complete misnomer (more like "grudge"), as the action is quite limited and the storyline convoluted. In the end, it all makes a little more sense, through some flashback and revealing, that could have saved us all about half an hour, had we been given that information in the first place.

After starring in some innovative action films that always gave us at least one new interesting set piece or fight scene, Jet Li and Jason Statham are just going through the motions on this one. A 10 minute documentary on the choreography of their past films would have had more drama and thrills than this entire movie. It's a surprise this didn't go straight to video. Just another installment in the action genre.

Grade: C

Superbad

Directed by: Greg Mottola
Starring: Jonah Hill, Michael Cera, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Bill Hader, Seth Rogen
Running Time: 1h 54min

It's hard not to hate the hype surrounding Judd Apatow and his league of comedy superheroes, as every thing they've ever done is being pulled out and branded as "from the guys who brought you The 40 Year Old Virgin and Knocked Up." Now those are two good movies, but compared to the hilarity of Superbad, they should be honoured to be mentioned in its presence.

Superbad is a nice return to those teen comedies of the 80s, only more raw and realistic. These kids swear. A lot. There isn't any pandering to what we wish teens were, but rather a hyper realised dream of what one wild night in pre-college American teen life could turn out to be. The search for sex, by way of booze, by way of fake IDs, by way of ridiculous teenage forging is on! This is Porky's, Weird Science, and Revenge of the Nerds, all rolled into one. Only with more swearing.

Each scene one ups the previous one, and the hi jinks are gut busting funny. Cera plays a great foil to Hill's foul mouthed buffoon, balancing crass with class. Mintz-Plasse is piss your pants funny as the king of the nerds, McLovin, sure to be a teen reference for years to come. Hader and Rogen, showing up as a pair of cops, bring the absurd to the film, giving us the requisite adult characters found in these films, but not quite as we expected them to be.

Yet despite all the great lines, inventive staging, and silly situations these teens get themselves into, it is the heart at the center of their friendship that really elevates this film above mere teen comedy. Its sentiment saves it from being a boy's fantasy night on film to an honest depiction of the confusing growth a teenage boy must navigate on his way to maturity. The coming of age storyline is nicely laid underneath it all, giving value to what could easily be throwaway gags and staged guffaws.

What is really great about Superbad, is how the dialogue is so funny, yet so realistically coming out of the mouth of these teens. There are so many quotable lines that you'll have to watch it several times to soak it all in. And like only the best comedies do, it will get funnier and funnier each time you see it. A sure to be future classic, a shoe in for the Teen Sex Comedy Hall of Fame.

Grade: A-

8.25.2007

The Ex

Directed by: Jesse Peretz
Starring: Zach Braff, Amanda Peet, Jason Bateman, Charles Grodin, Mia Farrow, Donal Logue, Amy Poehler
Running Time: 1h 30min

A promising comedy that could go in many directions, The Ex takes the basic comedic staple of an ex entering the life of two newlyweds, as Bateman's wheel chair bound high school cheerleading cohort of Peet ends up being a coworker to Braff, who is married to the company president's daughter. Braff already has issues with what Peet's father thinks of him, and when Bateman starts making waves in both the office and the family, Braff's jealous streak gets the best of him.

The comedic talent in this film is evident, but well wasted on the belaboured premise. It doesn't help that each and every character acts in a deplorable manner, so there really isn't anyone to care about or root for, as each is equally annoying.

Bateman does a great job of testing our sympathies for a man in a wheelchair, begging us to hate him in spite of his affliction. It's amazing how he can be sweet and sensitive (he was the heart of Arrested Development) yet turn in such a nasty, underhanded performance here.

Black comedy is probably the best way to describe this film, but it doesn't really want to leave its romantic comedy undertones, and finds itself split between a Farrelly brothers style "how low can you go" brand of humour, and a slapsticky, Meg Ryan kind of comedy. The subject matter and script stylings do not give enough for these leads to do, which is really disappointing.

Grade: C

8.19.2007

The Lookout

Directed by: Scott Frank
Starring: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Jeff Daniels, Matthew Goode, Isla Fisher, Carla Gugino, Bruce McGill
Running Time: 1h 39min

A different take on the bank heist film, The Lookout does a great job of situating a big time action movie premise, into a realistic, small town setting. Gordon-Levitt plays a young man whose life has a dramatic set back, which he must deal with everyday of his life. When people from his past discover his predicament, they think of how they can manipulate him into doing what they want him to do.

Clever, surprising, and interestingly developed, The Lookout takes some nice twists and turns on the genre. From the complexity of the main character, and his own personal demons and conflict, to the imprint a small town can have on our present day relationships, every aspect of the script has many layers. It all subtly unfolds, with an ending that is satisfying and true to the characters we're presented with.

If there is any film I could compare it to, it reminds me of the late 90s film "A Simple Plan", which told the story of how money can corrupt and corrode relationships, causing people to act in ways they would have never imagined. Yet all presented in a small, intimate way, like an excellent novel unfolding before us, keeping us in suspense the whole while.

Grade: B

Fracture

Directed by: Gregory Hoblit
Starring: Anthony Hopkins, Ryan Gosling, David Strathairn, Rosamund Pike, Embeth Davidtz, Billy Burke, Cliff Curtis
Running Time: 1h 53min

A nice chess match of a murder mystery, pitting Hopkins as an accused criminal against Gosling's young prosecutor, Fracture is sure to delight and tease your mind. Reminiscent of the exchanges that punctuated Silence of the Lambs, Hopkins delivers a cold and controlled performance, with just enough hint of madness and jealousy to keep Gosling second guessing.

Gosling, in turn, matches Hopkins step for step, both in the setting of the story, and as an up and coming actor sharing the screen with film royalty. They wear their emotions on their faces well, exhibiting each nuance of frustration, smugness, and complexity. It's such a treat to have two actors at the top of their game, that the tight script and witty dialogue is an added bonus.

Grade: B

8.15.2007

Hot Rod

Directed by: Akiva Schaffer
Starring: Andy Samberg, Jorma Taccone, Bill Hader, Isla Fisher, Sissy Spacek, Ian McShane, Will Arnett
Running Time: 1h 28min

If you enjoyed the 80s, or enjoy laughing at the 80s, or wish they made movies like they did in the 80s, then Hot Rod is for you.

When i say, "make movies like they did in the 80s", i mean it. Hot Rod captures that feeling completely! Not in a spoofy way, either. It's as though this film was actually shot and developed in the 80s. Which is the best way to spoof anything--to realistically recreate it, and let the straightforward presentation be interpreted by the audience for the hilarious parody that it is. This is the "Airplane!" or "Top Secret" of 1980s films. Definitely not the "Date Movie", (jam as many scenes from recent movies as you can, with a fat or fart joke for good measure), type of lame duck comedy.

Right from the opening credits, you question whether you accidentally hooked up the VCR instead of the Blu-ray player, or stepped into a retro cinema, rather than an IMAX experience. i saw this one at the Drive-in, adding greater pleasure to the throwback nature of the film. The cheesy soundtrack seems like Footloose 2, and when you see him take a run out into the forest, shadow boxing himself, you can just smell the Kevin Bacon in the air.

Even though all the eightyosity makes for an amusing film experience, let's face it. Those cheesy 80s teen movies weren't all that great, which means spoofing them straight up makes for a silly, yet still kind of lame movie. Hot Rod's plot, centered around a boy who wants to do an amazing stunt to raise money so that he can save his step dad's life just so he can kick his ass, Mano e Mano, is a goofy as it gets. So as the film unfolds with all the slapstick missed stunts and TV after school special crying fits of the actors, it's funny, but in a bad way.

Still, you have to admire the lovingly way these guys approach this film. They must really have immersed themselves in plenty of synthesized soundtracks and anti-climatic teen dramas to make such a faithfully reconstructed parody. Definitely not for everyone, but those in on the joke, with think this is "cool beans".

Grade: C+

Stardust

Directed by: Matthew Vaughn
Starring: Charlie Cox, Ian McKellen, Sienna Miller, Peter O'Toole, Rupert Everett, Michelle Pfeiffer, Claire Danes, Robert De Niro, Ricky Gervais
Running Time: 2h 08min

Grade: B+

7.27.2007

Live Free or Die Hard

Directed by: Len Wiseman
Starring: Bruce Willis, Timothy Olyphant, Justin Long, Maggie Q, Kevin Smith
Running Time: 2h 10min

Grade: B+

Grindhouse

Directed by: Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino (with extras from Eli Roth, Edgar Wright, and Rob Zombie)
Starring: Rose McGowan, Zoe Bell, Tracie Thoms, Freddy Rodríguez, Kurt Russell, Josh Brolin, Rosario Dawson, Bruce Willis, Vanessa Ferlito, Quentin Tarantino
Running Time: 3h 09min

Overindulgence has always been the modus operandi for these two auteur directors, though not in a financial form. Rodriguez is perhaps the most thrifty director around, overindulging his creative palate by writing, directing, scoring, editing and physically shooting his films. Tarantino, on the other hand, has always overindulged on dialogue, violence and odes to cinema oddity. Together, these two overindulge in the pleasure they derive from B-movie films, creating a compelling, though self indulgent grindhouse double feature, which they must have had more fun filming than we have watching.

First off is Rodriguez's take on the zombie flick, "Planet Terror". The better half of the double feature, this gore fest is true to the director's oeuvre, filled with over the top action, crazy cuts, and explosive stunts. It's story arc sticks to the traditional small-town-losers-in-way-over-their-heads-as-army-base-outside-of-town-unleashes-a-slew-of-zombies, and supplies plenty of opportunities for great lines, much machismo, and sweet sweet love making. It's everything a late night drive in experience should provide, and then some.

Planet Terror benefits from some superb performances from lesser lights, Rose McGowan and Freddie Rodriguez (uncertain if there is a family connection here), as well as some toned down supporting work, notably Bruce Willis. The director is no stranger to this genre, having travelled here before in The Faculty and From Dusk Till Dawn, (a far superior use of the two directors' talents). The cheesy special effects give way to mind-blowingly amazing makeup work, and the zombie cliches wind up seeming fresh in the lens of Rodriguez. Guilty fun, with laughs, screams, and gasps, Planet Terror sets us up for a rollicking ride at the Grindhouse.

Following the frenetic pace of the first film is a series of mock trailers, filled with funny cameos, ridiculous voice overs, and preposterous premises from some of the director's most visionary friends in the genre. Any full length treatment of these films would have been more interesting than Tarantino's book end, "Death Proof".

Now, i am a fan of Tarantino, and yet i still didn't find his half of the grindhouse all that interesting. You have to be a super fan of the films he's lovingly re-imagining to fully enjoy his take on a stuntman gone sadistic. Even still, he tests even the most hard core fan, by filling almost three quarters of the film with chicks speaking dialogue that goes nowhere, says nothing, and reveals very little about the characters on screen. For a writer-director that's made a living from his fresh, original and witty screen writing, Death Proof provides very little fodder for fun.

Russell is menacing and McGowan equally good in this second half, playing very different from her role in the first, but Dawson and company are wasted, suited up for eye candy and little else. The real star of the show is the stunt driving, but in this day and age of where we've seen everything, the car chase in Death Proof seems nothing more than an ode to car chases of yesteryear. Stunning, yes. Breath taking, certainly. Mesmerizing, for sure. But worth the hour of pointless dialogue beforehand? Definitely not. Tarantino has reached a point where his love of old movies is overpowering his ability to make new ones. Or inspiring him to make new bad ones. Someone needs to say no to him, as he is starting to abuse his position of harbinger of everything old is new again, instead of creating something fresh and exciting based on hidden gems of the past.

Like the films they are galvanizing, Grindhouse has great moments, but as a whole, is truly a B-movie, best viewed on video, where you can cut to the chase.

Grade: B

7.13.2007

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

Directed by: David Yates
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Imelda Staunton, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman, Evanna Lynch, Matthew Lewis, Katie Leung, Jason Isaacs, Ralph Fiennes
Running Time: 2h 18min

The fifth film from the seven book franchise, the Order of the Phoenix has the distinction of being the heaviest tome, the greatest battle yet, and the launching point of a number of key characters and plot threads that will play out in the series' conclusion. This all makes for wonderful reading, but very difficult viewing and screen writing.

Reading fans can lose themselves in the novel, expecting Harry to live on to see subsequent novels, enjoying his adolescent development and growing responsibilities. Film fans, however, can't invest the time needed to see the characters through their full story arcs, nor leave the theatre feeling satisfied with an installment without conclusion.

So, it is a wonder that the Order of the Phoenix manages to cram a healthy portion of the book's features while still moving along at a delicious pace, offering up enough character moments (Harry's first kiss) and action scenes (Quidditch is barely missed, as the broom flying really zooms with London as its playground). The three young leads continue to grow into their roles remarkably well, though some of their limitations are noticeable (Radcliff doesn't quite seem threatening enough when Harry's blood boils).

Secretly, as in many great "children's" films, it is the adult roles that really give us the greatest joy, and Staunton's turn as Delores Umbridge is frightfully spot on, gleefully sadistic as the bureaucratic representative from hell. Never has such rule following and attention to procedure been so sinister. The supporting cast of adults that reads like a British walk of fame continue to shine in small roles, lead by the inimitable Rickman as Severus Snape. If there were parts from the book that could have been beefed up for the movie, it was his occulemcy lessons. i would gladly have taken those scenes over the whole giant subplot.

Alas, some things have to get cut, and Kreacher's role seems to be the most omitted. Though, having read the series to the end now, it's almost a blessing in disguise as his character provides the most inconsistency in the series. Yet the introduction of Luna Lovegood and emergence of Neville and Ginny as full fledged characters really give fans and cinephiles much to rejoice about.

Darkest in tone, most quietly (and subsequently, eerily) paced, and grandest in scope, the Order of the Phoenix does a remarkable job of resting comfortably amongst its predecessors, while steering the train in an all new direction. Though not as lush and lavish as the series' best Prizoner of Azkaban, it certainly makes its case as one of the top three. A series this long is always in danger of fizzling out before its story is told. Rest assured, the fifth feature only wets your appetite for more.

Grade: B+

7.09.2007

Snow Cake

Directed by: Marc Evans
Starring: Alan Rickman, Sigourney Weaver, Carrie-Anne Moss, Emily Hampshire, Callum Keith Rennie
Running Time: 1h 52min

A movie featuring an autistic character, that's not actually about autism. Alan Rickman gives perhaps his most nuanced performance, certainly the best work that i've ever seen him do. His character arc is integral to this sweet, though not sugary film that explores how tragedy can push and pull us in different directions.

Weaver co-stars as a woman with autism, and a child who supports her effort to live independently in a small, Northern town. When Rickman's character enters the lives of the small town inhabitants, through an unfortunate event, it disrupts the patterns that they've chosen to live by.

These habitual practices are called into question, and at times it seems that Weaver's autistic obsessive compulsive tendencies have more merit (attached to her autism) than the choices other adults make in their neurotypical lives. Like any good character study, Weaver's wonderful portrayal shines a light on what we value from our family and relationships with loved ones. The interaction between her and Rickman is equal parts hilarious and heartbreaking.

Carrie-Anne Moss and Callum Keith Rennie do great work in supporting roles, giving their roles an honesty and multi-layered angle, which fits well within the mysteries lying beneath Rickman's character's past and why exactly he is staying in the small town. Hampshire adds a vibrant vivacity of life to the film, where the adults that populate the screen seem too burned by life to exhibit the joy and exuberance that her and her autistic mother find in each snowflake.

A movie as delicate as a snowflake, yet so unique in its presentation of human responses to pain, love, and forgiveness, Snow Cake is the type of film that presents its characters so well, that you feel like you know them. In the process, you may just also learn a little more about yourself.

Grade: A

Transformers

Directed by: Michael Bay
Starring: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, Anthony Anderson, Jon Voight, John Turturro
Running Time: 2h 24min

A perfect example of a film whose sum of its parts is not nearly as good as the individual pieces. Transformers boasts some wicked CGI and some silly yet enjoyable performances from LaBeouf, Anderson, and Turturro, but leaves an unsatisfying feeling at the end of it all.

A movie like Transformers, based on the toys i loved as a child, should make you want to watch it over and over again. The wonder and excitement that permeates so many of Steven Spielberg's films (executive producer on this flick) is completely absent, giving way to Michael Bay's flashy yet forgettable style. He has a knack for formulating a truly eye popping experience, only to leave the viewer with little memory of what has transpired. A brilliant opportunity is missed here, as the parties involve deliver a truly unremarkable film.

The whole premise of robots changing into everyday vehicles or Earth objects, battling over a precious energy source is wide open for interpretation and storytelling. Unlike most adaptable source material, Transformers is capable of changing into any number of retellings or allegories. Yet, much like the nineties eye candy release, Independence Day, this sci-fi tale is all style, no substance. The human characters are throw away foil for the robots to play off of, and the robots are underdeveloped props in need of personality.

If there's one thing a drive-in theatre experience gives you, its an honest look at a film. Stripped of its overpowering sonic disguise and in your face visuals, a movie is left to perform on the bare bones of excellent film making; story, dialogue, performance, and cinematography. Transformers offers little of these essentials of movie making, opting instead for the sensory overload that Bay's oeuvre is loaded with.

It's too bad that Transformers is unable to switch between Spielberg's sensibilities and Bay's kinetic pacing. Underneath it all is a flimsy skeleton, unworthy of our attention, unless that attention is being bombarded by technology. Maybe there is a lesson to be learned from this film after all. Technological advancement is only as good as the character beneath that's driving it. And if that's the case, then Transformers, like robots, is in need of a soul.

Grade: B-

Shrek the Third

Directed by: Chris Miller and Raman Hui
Running Time: 1h 32min
i'm one of the few people who disliked Shrek 2 for its rehash of old jokes, minus the creativity and scope of the first film. In retrospect, i don't think i gave that film enough credit, as it does have some funny moments and some good use of new characters. Still, it really lacked the magic of the first film, as the originality of a fairy tale send up gave way for a Meet the Parents/My Fair Lady premise.
Shrek the Third confirms my feeling that this franchise has run out of steam. Revisiting major plot points once again, while borrowing from buddy road movies and high school flicks, the third installment offers little, if anything original, continuing to tarnish the novelty of the first Shrek. Myers and company seem content to rest on their laurels, spouting their lines with little spark or ad libs. You can almost sense Eddie Murphy's shame as he belts out another tune as Donkey.
The introduction of babies usually means a series has run out of fresh ideas, and the Shrek franchise is a perfect example of formulaic plot lines playing themselves out. There's the unwilling hero, afraid of his power and destiny. The hero's journey and development as he embarks on a quest. It's sad to see a series that so wryly turned these conventions on their head, succumb to the same conventions without a crumb of wit or satire the third time around.
The animation is still top notch, but without the humour or excitement of a storyline worth visiting (or revisiting, for that matter), Shrek the Third spins its wheels and ends up in a swampy mess. What once was a film for all ages has turned into a film for ages 6 to 10, only they won't get the references, while the adults won't get any laughs. Save your money for all the spin off merchandise, which is getting to be more original than the films themselves.
Grade: C+

6.26.2007

You, Me and Dupree

Directed by: Anthony Russo and Joe Russo
Running Time: 1h 48min
About 90 minutes too long, this horribly uneven film tries to play on the premise that rudeness, childishness, and infidelity can be quite amusing and fun to watch. Perhaps if it was relegated to a Saturday Night Live skit, but as a full length feature, You, Me and Dupree, much like the title character, wears out its welcome fast.
The entire cast is poorly utilized. Wilson's boyish charm is presented in such a way that it fails to charm as much as it chafes. Dillon's usually funny straight man is given a character arc that positions him erroneously as the villain. Hudson is left to be a comedic device, rather than the Meg Ryan replacement she was quirkily and cutely becoming. Even Douglas and Rogen are wasting in bit roles that don't allow their comedic chops to come out in their one note characters (though Rogen comes closest to comedy).
The idea of a childhood friend crashing in on a newlywed couple's home is neither new or novel. The Three's Company premise is classic comedic territory. So if we're going to revisit the turf, something new or refreshing has to happen. The only difference about Dupree is how three very decent actors have their winning streaks comes to an abrupt halt. Perhaps a documentary that mixes the off set usurping of recently wed Hudson by home wrecking Wilson and its parallels with the on set shenanigans would be more tantalizing to watch. Avoid this at all costs.
Grade: D+

Ratatouille

Directed by: Brad Bird
Starring: Patton Oswalt, Ian Holm, Lou Romano, Brian Dennehy, Peter O'Toole, Brad Garrett, Janeane Garofalo, Will Arnett
Running Time: 1h 50min

A rodent chef is the most unlikely endearing child's character you could think of, but the wizards at PIXAR studios have succeeded in creating a rat you will love for a long time to come.

Ratatouille is perhaps the worst title for what is perhaps the best film of the summer. Yet like many of the creative choices director Brad Bird made on this film, it stays true to the movie's concept and design. The title is, of course, referring to a French peasant dish, and plays a key role in the outcome of the film. Similarly, it is the same charm of said dish that wafts throughout the film, delectably tantalizing our movie tastes by ensuring every filmic ingredient is perfectly placed.

To begin, the animation is stunning. Now, this can be said of most any PIXAR film, but not since Finding Nemo captured the beauty of the sea, has an animated film visually breathed the essence of its locale. France is rendered beautifully in every scene, from the streets to the river to the cuisine; the eye candy is incredible.

Secondly, much like The Incredibles, Bird's previous PIXAR outing, the film never tries earnestly to cater to children. Instead, it expects the tots to pull up a chair at the adult table to enjoy the premise and playfulness of a mismatched rat and a restaurant heir, and their unlikely collaboration to restore glory to a famous restaurateur's franchise. The jokes are plentiful, ranging from slapstick to sophisticate, yet the story is first and foremost, a PIXAR trademark.

In a season that is rife with sequels (in actuality, sequels to sequels, or sometimes sequels to sequels' sequels), Ratatouille stands out as an imaginative piece, a sparkling original, a one of a kind concoction. Basically, a signature dish amongst standard fare. The voices cast are very talented, yet not exactly your obvious choice in a time when animated films have been privy to stunt casting (are you listening, Shrek?). This adds to the authenticism and uniqueness of the film, as the audience can easily immerse themselves in the world the PIXAR team has masterfully painted.

Some scenes are so realistic that you almost forget you are watching animation, while others seem to pop with an energy and action that no camera could possibly catch. The rats' eyes views are playfully exciting and exhilarating, and the food preparation so wonderfully presented that you can practically taste and smell the kitchen itself. More amazing, is how the animators have designed a rat that moves so realistically, lives amongst a rodent population so disgustingly vile, yet still manages to come across as cute and charming at the same time.

The only flaw of the film may be its unbelievable premise (a culinary rat controls the actions of an inept chef) yet the incredible animation makes the audience willing to believe anything can happen, so much so that while we're whisked along, some parts of the film seem to stall out at times. Still, for what must have been a truly hard sell, Bird's artistic vision is so refreshing, that it's a delight to take this gamble over a summer of sequels and leftovers. Not since Les Triplettes de Belleville has animation triumphed so wonderfully over any live action offering. A must see for all ages!

Grade: A

6.16.2007

Knocked Up

Directed by: Judd Apatow
Starring: Seth Rogen, Katherine Heigl, Paul Rudd, Leslie Mann
Running Time: 2h 09min

Comedies written solely for adults are so few and far between, that when they do emerge, people are quick to praise it. When i say, comedies for adults, i mean a film that only those who have endured some of the trials and tribulations of adult relationships will find it relevant and funny. On this measure, i give Mr. Apatow and his cast a resounding applause.

However, dropping the F-bomb with reckless abandon does not a funny film make. Yet for some reason, Knocked Up thinks that a line delivered with a curse word is infinitely funnier than anything. Yet when one thinks about Woody Allen or Will Ferrell or Bill Cosby or Jerry Seinfeld or Monty Python, what can be said in front of the kids can be all the funnier for adults when we're getting away with the double entendre.

Knocked Up explores some familiar grown up territory, and deserves many of the laughs it gets. Rogan's brutally honesty lead makes for both excellent comedic fodder and audience sympathy. Rudd's character's secrets, on the other hand, endear us to his wicked ways, making us cringe while laughing and empathizing with his plight. Both men speak of their relationships in a refreshing manner, portraying modern day dating/marriage as the love/hate conundrum it can very well be.

Unfortunately, what occurs opposite this, are two female characters that seem to possess little self worth, existing solely for the temptation or torment of the male leads. Knocked Up wants to have it all; honest relationship drama alongside stereotypical and "only in the movies" scenarios. It plays both sides, well at times, painfully at others. In the end, it is overwrought and too easily wrapped up, but in between it provides some refreshingly new takes on adult life, in a way that too few films do. More plentiful than painful, Knocked Up is truly the replicated mixed blessing of a one night stand.

Grade: B

Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer

Directed by: Tim Story
Starring: Ioan Gruffudd, Jessica Alba, Chris Evans, Michael Chiklis, Kerry Washington, Andre Braugher, Laurence Fishburne, Doug Jones
Running Time: 1h 32min

i'll be the first to admit, i liked the first Fantastic Four film. In fact, i have rewatched it several times as it has been in heavy rotation on the Movie Network, and it actually gets better every time. i can't quite fathom why people (namely, critics) have taken these films so seriously, as though they must hold up a torch (pun intended) to the major comic book adaptations of recent years like Spider-Man, Batman, and X-Men.

Those films should be better than this one, as relatively, the comic books from whence they came are proportionately much better than the characters found in Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. Which, on a side note, begs me to ask the question, how exactly does the Silver Surfer "rise" in this installment? From where? To what? Or is it referring to the British expression, "to get a rise out of", and therefore, the Silver Surfer gives us some shits and giggles?

A good laugh and some fun action is all one could ask for out of this series, and round two does deliver these to some degree. Evans' Human Torch character still gets all the good lines, and actually takes the super hero genre in a much needed direction; the super hero that embraces the gift and lifestyle change to rock star status. Chiklis still supplies the ugly side of the superhero biz, in more ways than one. And Gruffudd and Alba continue to show zero chemistry and less acting ability as their brethren, yet remain stretchy and sexy enough for us to wish the Fantastic Four truly showed us what a formidable foursome would look like.

As for the introduction of the new character, Fishbourne and Jones team up well to create the voice and body of the Silver Surfer, but i've always thought the concept was more comic book art lesson on the aspects of proportion, rather than a fully fleshed out character. His whole existence as doomsday messenger for the stars is rather silly and non-threatening. Still, the movie does a good job of making him look cool, kind of like a modern day T-2000, but what he adds by way of interesting storytelling is nil.

If, like me, you don't expect much from these four, then you'll be satisfied by this sequel. However, don't expect much and pray they don't make another, unless they go for an NC-17 rating. Now, that's a Marvel production that'd break box office AND test the skills of the CGI department!

Grade: B-

Firehouse Dog

Directed by: Todd Holland

Starring: Bruce Greenwood, Bill Nunn, Josh Hutcherson, Mayte Garcia
Running Time: 1h 51min



With a title like Firehouse Dog, one expects an Air Bud style film, complete with a dog who rides the fire truck, holds a hose, climbs ladders, and pees out fires. Thankfully, this film is NOT one of those, though there are some scenes in which the titular dog does engage in traditional fireman (fire person) work fare (which isn't to say that a film with all that excitement isn't a bad idea, wink, wink).

The movie starts out promising enough, with a wild stunt involving the dog, who eventually is revealed to be a pampered movie star with some handlers who are quite attached, with questionable but honest motives for being the dog's entourage. Once dog and handlers are separated, the dog ends up in the hands of a boy whose single dad is head of a firehouse in need of a mascot.

By now, i know you're saying, can this movie get any hokier? To which i respond, no. But it can have a real heart to it. And even though most of the performances are worthy of an after school special, especially the precocious child actor, whose presence begs for a few more open auditions, this film rises above the content to provide a family friendly dose of entertainment, filled with father-son bonding, small town camaraderie, and cute teen romance.

As much as i wanted to make fun of this film, and hate it for pandering to a young audience, i'll leave that for some other cynical cyber reviewer. Instead, i'd rather enjoy it for what it is, a surprisingly enjoyable, cute and warm family film that middle America can enjoy for years to come. Here's to the sequel, Canine Patrol!

Grade: B-

6.02.2007

Deja Vu

Directed by: Tony Scott
Starring: Denzel Washington, Paula Patton, Val Kilmer, James Caviezel, Adam Goldberg, Bruce Greenwood
Running Time: 2h 08min

As you're watching this film you may get the impression that you've seen it once before. That's not because of the title, but more so due to the fact that it is the second collaboration between director Scott, actor Washington, and producer Jerry Bruckheimer, previously united on Man on Fire.

That was a good film, and this one is no slouch either. Both visually stylish, Scott likes to tell stories through images rather than words or sound, and you'll see a lot of info and emotion communicated in slow-mo, or jump cut imagery. This suits his collaborators just fine, as Bruckheimer is known for his worldwide blockbusters, which must translate well into dozens of languages. As for Washington, it's been known for a long time now that he can do more with his pinky than most actors can do with their life's work, and rumour has it, Denzel isn't too hard on the eyes, with or without his mouth closed.

So, what are they doing together again, for the first time? Delivering an interesting twist on the crime scene reconstruction film. Washington's ATF agent arrives on the scene of a ferry explosion in New Orleans, and through the miracle of some new technology, is able to revisit the past week to try and reconstruct the events, and somehow figure out a way to catch the perpetrator, either before or after it happens(ed).

Now, it may sound confusing, and it is quite complicated, but c'mon!, this is a Jerry Bruckheimer film. So damn the logic, and on to the action. Denzel has this uncanny ability to raise the standard fare to the artistic, and he elevates this crime film to must see status. He is aided by two of Hollywood's funnier and forgotten castmates, Kilmer and Goldberg, as well as the seriously underrated Caviezel, who is on par with Washington; no small feat.

The film keeps the viewer riveted, as Washington turns up the emotional heat as the clock ticks nearer and nearer to the moment where time has run out. Given the sci-fi element, it is difficult to predict, as anything can and will happen, yet like most of Bruckheimer's summer fare, a quaint love story is somehow intertwined amidst all the danger and intrigue, giving the preset action sequences some emotional weight.

Scott's stunts and action set pieces are top notch, and could make this a decent film even with B-list actors. Yet having such a fun and interesting cast turns this standard (and bordering on the far fetched) action film into something the audience has come to associate with Denzel: another fine, solid, and thrilling caper. He never ever seems to disappoint, again and again. Which is where that sense of experiencing Deja Vu comes from.

Grade: B+

6.01.2007

The Fountain

Directed by: Darren Aronofsky
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Rachel Weisz, Ellen Burstyn
Running Time: 1h 36min


From the brilliant mind of Aronofsky comes an independent film feel of a grand science fiction love story that spans centuries in scope, but shoots with a simplicity in mind.

Reminiscent of Kubrick's 2001, as it conjures up futuristic images of space and man transcending to another form, while at the same time, delving into the past and searching for the connections which bind us generationally, The Fountain is a sweeping romance set against the backdrop of man's attempt to use science to defeat destiny and nature.

Jackman and Weisz play triple roles with much conviction, remaining consistent in each time era, while altering their characters just enough to seem like distant reincarnations. After spending much time in development hell, this film has had the good fortune to be embraced by these two leads, as they show why they are two of the better actors on screen right now.

Aronofsky's vision has always been breathtaking, and despite budget slashing and big name A-list actor replacement (Brad Pitt was attached for a long time), his revision of the original concept seems to do more with less. Minimal budgets call for creative stretching, and no one is as creatively stylistic as Aronofsky. If ever there was a director to take up the mantle from Kubrick, it is him, as this film demonstrates.

Classic sci-fi embraces a fantastical element of science and molds it into modern day fabric, revealing more about our present day selves in the process. This is what excellent science fiction is about. Using a probable future to make lessons for a better present. Not alien kill fests or time travel hokiness. The Fountain unfolds slowly, poetically, edging us towards a conclusion we wish for, but are unsure of. Along the way, little reveals are given as the three time tales converge, and each unveils more threads as it unravels.

Using age old myths and legends about the Fountain of Life and biblical promises, Aronofsky's film shows us what masterful storytelling looks and feels like. The actors are almost palpable, as the imagery matches the performances; and though not as shocking or stunningly painful to watch as Requiem for a Dream, The Fountain echoes the maturity and beauty that the director can find in dark places. Certainly a film for cinephiles, and fans of timeless love stories in a Kubrickian/Lynch style. This may perhaps be the best film ever to be shelved, cancelled, rescheduled, switch studios, slash budgets and finally get a release. It's a miracle that Aronofsky managed to salvage a film at all, let alone one as innocently sweet and alarming as this one.

Grade: B+

5.26.2007

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End

Directed by: Gore Verbinski
Starring: Johnny Depp, Geoffrey Rush, Orlando Bloom, Keira Knightley, Bill Nighy
Running Time: 2h 48min

An epic conclusion(?) to this epic series, which redeems itself for the horrible second installment, and then some. Much easier to follow (even when a dozen Depps appear), much more for the entire cast to do, and much more fun to enjoy, knowing that, unlike the first sequel, there will actually be an ending to this one, so hold in there!

Indeed, this time around the Pirate series doesn't drag despite its near three hour running time, but rather floats along like it has the wind at its back. Waiting a good half hour before we get to even catch a glimpse of Depp as Captain Jack should be criminal, yet we hardly miss him as Geoffry Rush and Chow Yun Fat chew the scene. In fact, it is Rush's presence which returns the series to the glory of the first film, and his return really emphasizes how integral he was to the guilty pleasure that was the Curse of the Black Pearl. He is the only actor in the series that holds his own with Depp, if not showing him a thing or two.

The entire first sequence hearkens back to Return of the Jedi, as the rogue leader's friends must come rescue him from his purgatory prison, just like Luke and Leia had to visit Jabba to gain release of Han Solo. Much like Solo, Depp's Captain Jack character finds his appeal in his naughty nature, and how his plans play out with a pinch of courage and a bucket load of luck. He's a wonder to watch reprising his timeless anti-hero.

Fortunately, (for us AND for Bloom) Will Turner is given more reason to exist in this film, and drives more of the story and decision making. It's a testament to the writers that they would fore go the desire to highlight Captain Jack (which seemed to be the modus operandi for Dead Man's Chest) and keep Will and Elizabeth's motives at the centre of this film.

Though, with so much going on, some concepts fizzle out, like the whole Calypso affair, which is talked up but fails to deliver, typical of a pirate wager. The purgatory Jack scenes are hilarious, and are an excellent way to answer the question, "How do we get more Johnny Depp into this one?" or "Who can make a great foil for Captain Jack, by matching his eccentric zaniness?" As for action, there's carnage galore, with just the right amount of comedic breaks so as not to experience seasickness.

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End isn't as rewatchable as the first one, but it definitely proves itself worthy of standing alongside it, and thankfully washes away the bad taste that number two left in moviegoers' mouths.

Grade: B+

The Invisible

Directed by: David S. Goyer
Starring: Justin Chatwin, Margarita Levieva, Marcia Gay Harden, Alex O'Loughlin, Callum Keith Rennie
Running Time: 1h 37min


An odd little film about a teenager who dies, only to discover that he has returned as a spirit, The Sixth Sense style, to walk among the suspects and friends left behind. He learns much more about his assailant, and through the new found power to be a fly on the wall, begins to see his murder not as the black and white situation that most authority figures (cops, teachers, parents) quickly conclude it is.

This film would make an excellent short story for high school students. Unfortunately, it plays like a high school short film. The lead actor simply can't carry the film, as he pouts, shouts, and mopes around, seemingly losing much of the charisma and promise that his character is supposed to have before he dies.

His counterpart, played by Levieva, is the only character that seems to get three dimensional treatment, as much of the film's heart and tragedy come from her performance. She does a good job of revealing a little at a time, which makes the film worth watching.

Supporting cast members, Rennie and Gay Harden do as much as they can in their minimal roles, but really get lost in the Degrassi style setups, where the teens do the heavy lifting, and in this instance, crumble to the weight of the story.

Still, the audience for this film is probably the same age as the lead characters, and they may find some intrigue in the slow development of this teen tale. There may not be enough jumps and jolts for the tween crowd as other films of the genre, but there certainly is more substance to the story's imagination.

Grade: C

5.05.2007

Ghost Rider

Directed by: Mark Steven Johnson
Starring: Nicolas Cage, Eva Mendes, Peter Fonda, Wes Bentley, Donal Logue
Running Time: 1h 54min

This is throwaway adaptation delivered as a truly silly bit of comic book nonsense, which undermines the desired darkness of the 70s superhero, Ghost Rider. Don't get me wrong, but there's a lot of diehards out there who love their Ghost Rider, along with their Steely Dan, Ministry, and Friday the 13th in Port Dover. Strangely, this film does little to satisfy those types, with Cage's Carpenters listening stunt man really messing with the take no prisoners attitude that comes with the flaming two wheeler.

So, it's a quirky take on an oddball super hero? Not quite. The story still tries to shove a bunch of the supernatural and theological mumbo jumbo that's at the centre of the comic book, which causes the whole project to go up in flames. It's a trick balancing act, fire and brimstone, stunt circuses and soul sucking purgatory. A juggling act that the source comic book itself didn't do too well.

Yet the time was right to make the film, as a superhero boom (thanks to advances in computer FX) is generating as many hits as misses in the past decade. Chalk one up for the misses, as this one succeeds only at producing some eye popping visuals, which was the key strength of the comic. When it gets down to it, the comic itself was really just an excuse for some talented artists to draw a cool looking dude with a flaming skull for a head all clad in leather and sporting some chains and a chopper. They could have abandoned the script and just digitally altered Evil Knievel footage and most fans would have been happy.

All in all, it's worth a watch for comic book/biker fans, but not many more. It's great to see Peter Fonda turn up as an Easy Rider, and Cage is his usual self, whether you love him or hate him. In fact, the cast gives of themselves wholeheartedly. As expected, Mendes is almost as smoking and blazing as Johnny Blaze himself. Let's just be thankful that there's no chance for a sequel, and this ghost can ride off into the sunset.

Grade: C+

Spider Man 3

Directed by: Sam Raimi
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace, Bryce Dallas Howard
Running Time: 2h 20min

Anticipation being at an all time high, the third Spidey flick seems bound to disappoint. Add to that, the amazosity that was the first two films, it's almost guaranteed to not be near as good as the first two parts of the saga. And it isn't. Despite the fact, Spider Man 3 is a very good action film that delivers everything you'd expect from it. Yet unlike the previous two, there just isn't a whole lot more.

The premise is promising. Peter and MJ are becoming more like the adults that fill the comic book pages of today, and the characters of Sandman and Venom enter the fray alongside the Green Goblin. Unfortunately, you can have too much of a good thing, and this third installment suffers from the same problems as Batman Forever; too many ideas, too little time.

Instead of telling the saga of Venom, the dark side of Peter Parker brought out by the alien symbiote, with slowly increasing menace and suspense, the whole ordeal is rushed through the film, highlighted by a ridiculous musical number. Don't get me wrong, i appreciate Sam Raimi's attempt at an homage to Saturday Night Fever, but it doesn't belong in this film, or with the tone it strikes. Clever, but misguided.

What really shouldn't work is Bruce Campbell as an overzealous maitre'd, yet he steals the show, adding some nice humour at a key dramatic point in the film. Alongside the hilarious, Jonah Jamieson, these two take what little screen time they have and serve up the most satisfying moments. This is where Raimi's risks work, on a small scale. He continues to deliver some amazing set pieces, but fails to unite them with the same drama or intensity of the first two films. Several characters seem to appear simply for recognition's sake, adding little to the story or thematic elements.

Sandman is visually amazing, and played to the max by Thomas Haden Church. Like his comic book counterpart, he is a neat idea, with little behind it. Which was often my beef with Marvel comic characters; they were interesting ideas, with little relevance or psychological value. Venom defied this rule, exploding from the pages of the Amazing Spider Man like no other villain of the modern era. Yet Raimi fails to learn from the mistakes of comic sequels past, such as X-Men 3 and the aforementioned Batman Forever (not to mention Batman and Robin or Superman 3, 4, 5). He succumbs to the "more means better" misbelief of Hollywood, when in fact, the more plot lines, the thinner the payoff. Venom is deserving of his own film (and may get it in Spider Man 4) while plot lines involving Sandman, Harry Osborn, and Gwen Stacy are mere window dressing, falling far short from their importance in comic book lore. Stacy is perhaps the most miserable casting error in a long time, as Howard wins the nepotism award for sure. No wonder she refuses to audition for roles; she'd never get one if not for Daddy Ron.

All this negativity aside, the film delivers as an enjoyable, fast paced action extravaganza that shouldn't disappoint non-discriminating fans. It has the five requisite "trailer moments" of action and excitement, stays light and airy even during what should very well be dark moments of the film, and has some impressive special effects that continue to push the envelope on super hero effects work. It holds no surprises, satisfies on a couple of levels, and leaves you wanting some more, but none too soon. Kind of like a holiday weekend. Enjoy!

Grade: B+

5.01.2007

The Good Shepherd

Directed by: Robert De Niro
Starring: Matt Damon, Angelina Jolie, Alec Baldwin, Billy Crudup, Robert De Niro, Michael Gambon, William Hurt
Running Time: 2h 47min

A fascinating journey into the inner recesses of your mind, as you slowly feel yourself drifting to sleep. The Good Shepherd is like counting sheep, only with really good actors. Robert De Niro calls in the favours and gets a compelling cast together to act out the most boring film about one of the most spine tingling moments of the modern era. Who'd have thought the CIA could be this dull?

After about half an hour, you'll be longing for Damon to get into Jason Bourne spy mode, but alas, it never happens. Too bad, as CIA agents must lead a tedious and boring life, if this is supposed to be an accurate portrayal. Despite the set ups and dialogue heavy moments, nothing pays off, as you wish you had an interpreter for most of the film.

What's really sad is that the actors remain compelling enough for the viewer to trust them to take us somewhere. Anywhere. I was kind of wishing for some crazy Kubrick Eyes Wide Shut inspired orgy during the initiation. At least Jolie delivers on her requisite love scene. Yet even that is turned into paint drying ecstasy of the worst kind.

Save yourself some time, a LOT of time, and rent ANY OTHER movie with these actors in it. May i suggest Glengarry Glen Ross or Dark City. Hell, even Tomb Raider would be a step up from this yawn.

Grade: ZZZ

4.15.2007

Kinky Boots

Directed by: Julian Jarrold
Running Time: 1h 47min
A fun little Brit comedy that uses a wild true story about a man who inherits a shoe factory and needs to alter the product line in order to stay in business. Done in typical Brit fashion, with feel good moments, honest dialogue, and stereotypical, but endearing characters, Kinky Boots warms the soul and tickles the funny bone.
Much in the vein of The Full Monty, Greenfingers and Waking Ned Devine, this film is fun for all and all for fun.
Grade: B

3.31.2007

Blades of Glory

Directed by: Josh Gordon and Will Speck
Running Time: 1h 37min


Like "Sex on Ice"! Well, hilarious, wet your pants and get tears in your eyes sex on ice. Will Ferrell continues his amazing run of ridiculously funny send ups of eras and cultures that deserve to be skewered through the improv mastery of he and his friends.

Figure skating, though filled with talented athletes, is quite silly to behold, second only to other Olympic sports skeleton and speed skating. And that's for the costumes alone. Watching Blades of Glory would be funny as a silent film, just to give you an indication of how brilliant the wardrobe department is for this film. In fact, i found myself watching it out of the corner of my eye while watching two other films that i paid for at the drive in, and laughing each time i glanced at the screen. i went to see it a day later.

The good news is that it's even funnier with sound. Ferrell and Heder work well together, giving us just enough familiarity (a little Ron Burgandy and Napolean Dynamite line delivery) but creating an oddly believable partnership as two former Men's figure skating champions who get banned from competition, only to return as a pairs entry due to a rules technicality/loophole.

The film wastes no time producing decent belly laughs, by introducing the two characters in Olympic TV coverage fashion, using 2 minute bios with hilarious voice over narration, and equally funny still photos and flashback video. By playing it close to the actual competition and sport, the film gets even funnier once the leads are able to improv their way to joke after joke after joke within a serious sports movie cliche premise.

The physical comedy is blended nicely with one-liners and sight gags, and the supporting players keep the humour coming when Ferrell and Heder aren't on screen. The only setback is when a reoccuring stalker character takes the screen, as the inital joke wasn't that funny, and turning it into a running gag makes it even less funny. At least it lets the viewer take a breather and wipe their eyes dry.

i was impressed at how the film approached the concept or premise without opting for the easy, Brokeback Mountain gag, or nasty homophobic comment. Instead, the brotherly love becomes a center piece of the storyline, allowing the comedy to rotate around it. There are a lot of similarities between how this film and Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story and Ferrell's other films balanced their romance and drama, which makes the comedy much more relevant and funny.

Molded in the same manner as Anchorman and Talladega Nights, though not as consistently funny as those two films, Blades of Glory is instantly quotable and gives the audience those moments of hilarity that make you laugh out loud to yourself even when you recall them three days later. i can't wait to purchase the DVD so i can watch the pair's first competition skate over and over to "Capture the Dream!". i know i will never look at figure skating the same way again.

Grade: A-