12.23.2009

The Princess and The Frog

Directed by: Ron Clements and John Musker
Running Time: 1h 37min

It's almost surreal to think that an African American was voted president of the United States before one was anointed princess in a Disney film, but it is certainly a sign of the times. Oddly enough, this momentous occasion comes in the form of traditional, two dimensional hand drawn animation. Lovingly rendered, The Princess and the Frog feels like a film Disney should have made a few decades ago.

Watching this film evoked a feeling of nostalgia, even from someone such as myself, who didn't really live and breathe Disney as a child. In all honesty, I was always a fan of the "animal" animated Disney films (Robin Hood, Fox and the Hound, The Jungle Book) and not one for the princess tales. Which is probably why I enjoyed this film. A majority of the film involves no humans, but rather two frogs, a trumpet playing crocodile, and a forlorn firefly. These characters are not all that memorable, meaning they won't merchandise as well as Disney would like them to.

Yet the classic animation styled in the manner of the era, coupled with the jazzy soundtrack straight from its New Orleans setting, give this film its memorable moments. The music bounces along with a rhythm stylistically matched by the animation. The feeling is not unlike The Aristocats or Cousin Louie's "I Wanna Be Like You" number from The Jungle Book; you can't help but tap and move your feet and get into the groove. I truly enjoyed the musical numbers and the animation that went along with them. However, when the music stops, the story lingers with little humour or suspense or even a sense of adventure; all elements that we've come to expect from a decade's worth of Pixar as our animation diet. (Studio secret: We LOVE Pixar because of the stories they concoct; the animation just happens to be equally as good and up to par with the stories themselves.)

The Princess and the Frog is a bit of a letdown when it comes to having a memorable villain. The entire voodoo premise could be downright frightening but Dr. Facilier (who thought up that name??) isn't as menacing as he could be. His creepy shadow buddies seem straight out of Oogie Boogie's spooky repertoire, but the doctor himself doesn't have enough cojones to place him in the classic villain Parthenon. All in all, the movie certainly is reminiscent of Disney gems of old, but definitely not worthy of the Disney greats that graced us in the early nineties.

Grade: B+

12.06.2009

Fantastic Mr. Fox

Directed by: Wes Anderson
Running Time: 1h 27min

Seriously. How lucky are we? How lucky are we to have studios with enough guts, in these strange economic times, to green light and release auteur films based on children's books? Wes Anderson's Fantastic Mr. Fox is NOT your standard, run of the mill children's fare. Indeed, I would argue that this film was definitely not made FOR children, but rather for adults who read Roald Dahl AS children. Much like Spike Jonze's Where the Wild Things Are released last month, this is an adaptation faithful to the very core and essence of the literary work, exploring psychological/philosophical territory while at the same time conveying whimsy and fantastical imagination in a way books only can.

Fantastic Mr. Fox is painstakingly created through stop motion animation, with the detail that Anderson puts into all of his films. The foxes look furry, the countryside looks stunning and Boggis, Bunce, and Bean look like the worst, no good, mean cuss, sons of cusses you've ever seen. The energy is wonderful, from the initial chicken heist to the frantic digging getaway to the film's finale. There is plenty for kids to love, but much more for adults to enjoy.

The voice cast is simply some of the best actors around, performing at their best. Familiar Anderson alumni return with great effect, notably Schwartzman, Murray, Dafoe and Wilson. Yet it's newcomers to Anderson territory, Clooney, Strep and Gambon, that provide the heart, soul and evil, respectively, that gives this film an emotional punch and an air of suspense.

Quirky as ever, Anderson adds his own elements to expand the text to feature length size. These provide some odd, bizarre, yet strangely enjoyable tidbits. From whackbat to the mysterious wolf, or new characters like Kristofferson and the Cider cellar rat, each and every addition just brings about more Dahl like pleasures. Anderson truly understands his craft, and demonstrates a love for Dahl's work in the process. Both are completely original, one of kind creators of a world that is so wonderfully depicted, it's hard not to enjoy returning to them again and again and again. I'm sure repeat viewings of this film will reveal more fantastic elements missed the first time around. Which is every bit as special as the relationship we had with Dahl's books when we were young.

Grade: A

10.17.2009

Where the Wild Things Are

Directed by: Spike Jonze
Running Time: 1h 34min

Excitement for the marrying of the wonderfully imaginative Maurice Sendak picture book with the bizarre and cerebral directorial efforts of Spike Jonze made "Where the Wild Things Are" one of the most anticipated films of the year for me (Wes Anderson's adaptation of Roald Dahl's Fantastic Mr. Fox is right up there). The previews set to the music of Arcade Fire gave me goosebumps. Then the previews of the talking wild things threw me for a loop and i was longing for a silent film.

Which is why recommending this film, which i definitely do, has to come with a warning. In order to enjoy this film, i think you need to enter the theatre without any preconceived notions of what you are about to see, or want to see, for that matter. For fans of Jonze, this should come as no surprise. He never fails to surprise, equally by what we see, but sometimes more importantly, by what we don't get.

This is NOT a movie for kids. BUT i took my kid to it. (She liked it. Or, in her words, "It was crazy a little bit!") This is NOT a typical adaptation of a kids story book (though some would argue it is a book much loved by the adults who have grown up having read it themselves as children). BUT it is a beautifully adapted piece of work, true to the tone and feel of Sendak's work. It is NOT a special effects extravaganza. BUT it is full of technical wizardry. It's a contradiction that i am hesitant to recommend, because i think it settles in under your skin and forces a personal response from each and every viewer. Which is exactly why it can be considered a positive triumph of a film.

As with most of Jonze's films, Where the Wild Things Are is probably going to get better with each viewing. Once the awe inducing visceral quality of the gigantic monsters starts to wear off (if ever it does--the picture book is still a hoot to look at), there is an emotional resonance that will continue to echo and haunt the film. Indeed, each wild thing seems to inhabit an element of a child's pscyhe, or at least a troubled, angst riddled child with personal demons. The voice cast is excellent, every step of the way, negating any fears i had that talking wild things would ruin the movie. O'Hara, Gandolfini and Ambrose are particularly great, lending their personal warmth, humour, and emotional sincerity in spades.

It's certainly a film filled with sadness, and an amazing understanding of the impact simple events have on children. True to the picture book's heart, the film steps deep inside the child's imagination and presents itself, in its entirety, from the point of view of Max. Jonze achieves this with crafty camera work, sparse yet solid dialogue, and fantastic imagery. Yet, unlike the candy coated eye popping imagination of say, Tim Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, this world is very dark, quite gloomy, and filled with anger. You will certainly leave the theatre feeling bummed, not your typical response from a child centric movie. However, it's the refusal to view children as anything but complex, imaginative, emotional creatures that gives Sendak's work a poignant beauty and wonder all its own. Jonze can confidently claim another faithful and fantastic adaptation to his oeuvre.
Grade: A-

9.28.2009

Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs

Directed by: Phil Lord and Chris Miller
Running Time: 1h 30min

Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs is one of those rare films that manages to deliver to audience expectations, no matter what age, while also offering something a little extra and unexpected. No, I'm not talking about the plot, which is the least developed aspect of the film. No twists or turns or surprises coming out of this meatball. What I am talking about is a plethora of unexpected sight gags, 80s references, and clever odes to the original source material.

Sony hasn't made that many animated movies, but the ones they have offered (Monster House, Surf's Up) have been original, clever material that tickles the parent as much as it entertains the child. Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs is every bit as delightful to look at as the original children's book it sparked from. Reading the book is all about gazing at the pictures in awe as streets are filled with spaghetti and a bulldozer modified to look like a dinner plate and utensils picks up mounds and mounds of delicious treats. It's one of those great books that you can read faster than you want to turn the page; the images are that scrumptious. Well, the movie, in glorious 3D no less, is spectacular to look at. The animators chose some excellent angles which are truly accentuated and enhanced in 3D. Thankfully, they didn't go overboard with food flying at your face, as the 3D serves the animation and artwork, and is not used in a gimmicky way.

The voice cast is very adept at comedy, really making some lines pop, while not being too distracting like some animation studio's use of stunt casting (yes, I'm talking about YOU, Dreamworks!). You will find yourself laughing at seemingly run of the mill lines, due to the excellent timing and line delivery of several SNL vets. However, the best element of the film for me was the sly yet very rewarding placement of iconic 80s images. Blink and you'll miss some of them, but there's no mistaking the timeless appeal of Mr. T.

Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs was a very welcome surprise and deserves a second viewing. This is one of the first films this year that I will probably purchase when it comes out on BluRay; for my daughter of course!

Grade: B+

8.30.2009

Inglourious Basterds

Directed by: Quentin Tarantino
Running Time: 2h 33min

i'm not one for the war movie genre much, but if i'm going to sit through two and half hours of World War II make believe, let it be one supplied by Quentin Tarantino. True to his violent, yet conversationally driven films of his oeuvre, Inglorious Basterds re-imagines second world war history through a group of soldiers bent on killing Nazis. Though the film doesn't do for war films what Kill Bill did for Kung Fu movies, it does offer us Col. Hans Landa, a film Nazi of gargantuan proportions, sure to go down in history as one of Hollywood's greatest villains.

Christoph Waltz bears mentioning, as his portrayal of Landa evokes as much charisma and charm as it does evil and menace. Never has a simple request for a glass of milk so chillingly foreshadowed such doom and gloom. Waltz speaks four languages in the film, and his ease at which he cunningly inspires fear and nervousness in each of them makes him all the more memorable.

The film has some amazing set pieces, (the film's first scene is an instant classic), which will be long remembered more than the sum of its parts. i may seemingly be too harsh in judging this film, as i do not think it ranks among Tarantino's five all-time best. In all honesty, i left the movie somewhat disappointed. That's not to say that Inglourious Basterds is not one of the year's best films. It's just, like Scorcese, Tarantino has given us such exemplary work, that to judge them against anything other than their own portfolio is to give serious short shrift to their cinematic measuring stick.

Grade: A-

8.26.2009

Funny People

Directed by:Judd Apatow
Running Time: 2h 26min

Not very funny. Am i the only one who thinks Apatow is overrated? Sure, the resurgence of dramedy for adults that he's leading has been refreshing, but someone has to show the guy how to cut a movie down to a suitable length. He's not Scorcese! All the actors are fine, but a documentary that shows what life is like for a stand-up comedian off stage would provide more interesting drama, (and probably a LOT more laughs) than this film delivers. Should have stuck to one or two simple themes, as this film gets too crowded and off base when it comes to its tone and content.

Grade: C

G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra

Directed by: Stephen Sommers
Running Time: 1h 58min

Sommers knows how to make fun, silly movies. This one is pure guilty pleasure. i have two words for you: FREAKIN' NINJAS!!! Watching Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow go toe to toe is worth the price of admission alone. Throwaway gags, decent action and explosions, over the top line delivery ("Knowing is half the battle"). What more could you ask for?

Grade: B+

8.15.2009

A Perfect Getaway

Directed by: David Twohy
Running Time: 1h 37min

A Perfect Getaway is one of those genre films that you really can't find too much fault in. Its small premise and beautiful locale make for your typical paradise thriller. All the formula is there: beautiful newlywed couples, one couple appears a little dangerous, there's a killer on the loose, isolated location, intermittent cell phone service. You know the drill. Still, there's something fun about watching these types of films, and Zahn and Olyphant both have that campy quality that works for shits and giggles. There's not a lot of doubt with foreshadowing that is basically foretelling, but it's fun to go along for the ride. Twohy is an able handed director, having made low budget, low concept, high tension thrillers before (Pitch Black) with just the right amount of humour. This one's no exception.

Grade: C

Ghosts of Girlfriends Past

Directed by: Mark Waters
Running Time: 1h 40min

There's something about Matthew McConaughey that just allows him to click with many a female lead. In Ghosts of Girlfriends Past, his umpteenth romantic comedy, all with similar premises, character traits, settings, occupations, etc., the list goes on and on, McConaughey manages to pull off another decent, likable rom com. This time around he gets a lot of help from the very likable Garner, who has a way of retaining her dignity in less than stellar roles and films. She is every bit McConaughey's equal and adds an element of decency and integrity to the movie.

Two decent leads does not a good movie make, and the supporting cast listed above are what finally bring this movie above passing for me. Chabert and Walsh are funny enough, in a bizarre train wreck sort of way, but it's Michael Douglas stealing the show, relishing his golden years in a ghostly performance that evokes his best roles as a philandering Hefnerite. Meyer and Forster are always reliable, decent actors in their own right, and with a cast that's performing up to par, the movie does not slide into formulaic staleness. It's more of a freshly baked formula; a familiar taste with a subtle elegance to it. Sure, the plot is telegraphed from start to finish, and the lines can be seen from a mile away, but when you have actors like these delivering it all, it makes it worth the while. Somewhat worth the while.

Grade: C


The Time Traveler's Wife

Directed by: Robert Schwentke
Running Time: 1h 47min

What with the multiple instances of the drive-in reel overheating and stopping the film, along with the movie's own stops and starts and bouts of inconsistency, The Time Traveler's Wife made me feel like I was jumping through time, lost, confused, bewildered, uninterested, perplexed and indifferent. For a movie to make claims for a love that transcends space and time, there needs to be some reason for this couple to actually love each other. Sadly, there is none, and there is little chemistry for the audience to care for. In fact, the whole premise that Bana's character visits McAdams as a young child carries with it a creepy pedophilia premise that i don't want to explore. Not only is it downright unsettling, it's simply boring.

Grade: D+


8.08.2009

Bruno

Directed by: Larry Charles
Running Time: 1h 21min

Every bit as funny as Borat, but in extremely different ways. Bruno shocks more than it evokes laughter. The preposterous situations and amazing ability of Sacha Baron Cohen to remain in character during the insanity that ensues offers up plenty of laughs. However, Bruno angers civilians and us as viewers more often than not, whereas the Borat character elicited sympathy more than anger or hatred.

The social commentary that Cohen creates through these outlandish characters is really what powers the comedy and establishes the humour. If there weren't outrageously homophobic (and in the case of Borat, xenophobic) people in this world, there would be no reason to unleash the likes of Bruno upon them.

It's sad to contemplate the danger that Cohen put his life in, on multiple occasions, throughout this film. Just when you think an ambulance is going to be needed, the film cuts away to another place, another scene, another provocative situation. At a lean 84 minutes, one wonders what the outtakes consist of. Is it merely Cohen breaks character (such a thought seems ludicrous, his concentration is so superb) or the laughs stop? Or do the homophobes reveal too much of themselves that the movie doesn't want to embarrass them (anymore than they have already embarrassed themselves)?

This is certainly not a film for everyone. Even those who liked Borat may be turned off by this one. It's amazing that some people's homophobia runs deeper than their ignorance. Depending on your level, this is either a hilarious expose of societal norms and stereotypes, or a repulsive display of sex and nudity. My level must be set high on the tolerance scale.

Grade: A-

7.20.2009

Push

Directed by: Paul McGuigan
Running Time: 1h 51min

Surprisingly effective piece of sci-fi comic booky mayhem. Push takes an X-Men or Heroes type of premise, ordinary people bestowed with extraordinary powers, and delivers an action movie with enough twists, turns and uncertainty to keep the viewer interested.

The special effects are neither groundbreaking nor breathtaking, but they serve the story effectively and play realistically enough that they do the story justice. Seeing Fanning play her age takes a little getting used to but she shows that she has enough spunk to carry her through her teens and most certainly into an honest to goodness, great actress, in the same manner of a Jodie Foster or Natalie Portman. Her presence drives the film and gives the entire movie enough dramatic punch and sly line delivery to merit a passing grade. Add to that a real chemistry between Fanning and Evans, and not in a creepy way, but more of a sisterly brotherly manner, and Push strikes a nice balance of action and drama.

The romance element doesn't really fit, but there's enough interesting action sequences and compelling back story to makes us temporarily forget the longing looks of the lovebirds. There's enough of a set up here to make for an interesting, medium budget weekly sci-fi series, and certainly enough to carry this pleasant surprise.

Grade: B+

7.17.2009

The Hangover

Directed by: Todd Phillips
Running Time: 1h 40min

Some people are calling the smash summer success of The Hangover a surprise. I'm not sure why. There's a proven director of funny, adult themed but not necessarily adult rated (read: not raunchy but rather clever) comedy. There's solid comedic actors underplaying a creative, original script. And there's spirited cameos that provide more hilarity than you could possibly imagine when writing them.

Everything that's become cliche about Vegas and what has to happen in a movie set in Vegas is turned upside down. Just the 5 minutes of photographs that play during the end credits provides more laughs than your average Will Ferrell film (by average, i mean more recent). Like classic comedies that stand the test of time, The Hangover builds slowly, allowing gags and premises to pay off as the film progresses. The relative coolness and calm of Galifianakis steals the show, yet each and every actor on screen gets to savour their moments in the kind of reactionary, and not forced, comedy that produces a snowball effect of infectious laughter.
Definitely the year's best comedy.

Grade: A-

7.15.2009

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Directed by: David Yates
Running Time: 2h 33min

As each year brings us closer to the finale of the Harry Potter film franchise, it seems each film becomes more and more anticipated. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is no exception. Anticipation was ramped up even more by delaying the release from Autumn 2008 to Summer 2009. Suffice to say, it was worth the wait.

The sixth Potter film breaks formula to some degree, as did the novel. Sure, there's a new teacher, Horace Slughorn, played hilariously by Broadbent. However, Slughorn does not take over the defence against the dark arts position, as that spot is finally granted to Snape. Though i would have enjoyed seeing some more of Snape in the classroom, it is a treat to watch, once again, some of Britain's finest actors inhabit Hogwarts, as the adult casting has always been the secret to the success of the films. Broadbent ensures that his performance is a memorable one, with some clever line delivery and even funnier facial expressions.

Indeed, this film continues the elevation of maturity that began with the third installment, as the content, themes, and tone take on a decidedly darker feel. This is not only evidenced in the darker colour palate of the art direction, but also the way drugs and alcohol are depicted in humourous circumstances. Much of the film's humour is found when potions and spells work overtime on the adolescent hormones. These moments are the source of some great laughs and help to off set the heavy drama that consumes most of the film.

Which is really what marks this film from the others that precede it. Half-Blood Prince is the most dramatic of the bunch. It is skimpy on the action, save for a few scenes that were made solely for the film. It takes a turn towards Lord of the RIngs style fantasy when Harry and Dumbledore set out to sea, a scene that is equally powerful on film as it was on the page. The filmmakers must be commended on their ability to translate the source material so that it manages to entertain, while at the same time advance the plot and appeal to readers of the Rowling series. After waiting this long, it's an amazing feat that they did not disappoint.
Grade: A

7.10.2009

Star Trek

Directed by: J.J. Abrams
Running Time: 2h 07min

I have to admit. I am a Star Trek virgin (insert your own punchline here). I have never, i repeat, never seen a Star Trek movie, let alone a Star Trek television episode. Not a one. Any of the generations (though i must admit i did stop to watch a few segments of The Next Generation but never lasted through two commercial breaks). This hasn't prevented me from learning a large amount of Star Trek lore and parody from your average immersion in popular culture, so i wasn't going into this film completely blind, just virginal.

Which is to say, i am part of the target audience that J.J. Abrams' reboot is designed for. He has crafted a Star Trek for fans, and non-fans alike, a starting point for the two to launch off through space. And what a take off it is! Inspired casting fuels the film, while clever dialogue and crafty action sequences propel it along at a fun and frolicky pace.

There's plenty of nod, nod, wink, winks (probably more than i noticed, not being a knowledgeable Trekkie) but also a feeling of freshness and excitement. It really truly feels like something so old and established has been dusted off and given a new coat of paint, so that you barely remember the original that existed. I say this in a good way. The complete opposite of George Lucas' disastrous attempt to make Star Wars new, Abrams gives the new Trek a style and flavour that seems completely current, while fashioning a story and tone that feels true to the original science fiction franchise and its subsequent incarnations. I look forward to further installments and I may just learn the Vulcan hand signs in due time.

Grade: B+

Transformers 2: Rise of the Fallen

Directed by: Michael Bay
Running Time: 2h 30min

Um, why did i go see this exactly? My wife made the comment that i looked completely unimpressed and offended the entire time watching this. Bigger and dumber than the original. I may just sell my old eighties toys if this keeps up. Gotta love that cast though. They really chew the scenery, knowing that their time on screen is just so there's something to cut away to between F/X shots. Not that it matters when there's more than enough jump cuts and rapid fire edits to outdo the entire French New Wave movement. This is what those auteurs would have referred to as, Le Crap.

Grade: D

7.08.2009

Taken

Directed by: Pierre Morel
Running Time: 1h 33min

A nicely paced little thriller buoyed by an intense performance by Neeson. Taken takes every father's worst nightmare and turns it into a revenge plot that's only real if your typical dad is ex-CIA or some other covert operating kick ass unit. The action is raw, the dialogue sparse, and the storytelling kept nice and simple. The thrill is in watching Neeson play a man consumed with only one thing: save his daughter. Another fantastic action thriller from Luc Besson and friends.

Grade: B+

7.07.2009

Confessions of a Shopaholic

Directed by: P.J. Hogan
Running Time: 1h 44min

Inspired casting makes this film a delectable treat. Isla Fisher is the most adorably funny actress to come along in a long, long time. i'm talking comedic chops worthy of Lucille Ball and Carol Burnett. Her physical comedy is unmatched, as her looks and glances elicit more laughs than most actresses entire life's work. Fisher's timing is impeccable, and alongside such trusted supporting players like Cusack and Goodman, the chemistry is just spot on. Dancy makes a good romantic foil for Fisher, and the two play off each other well. Still, this is Fisher's movie and though it does follow a formulaic outline that does little to save it from Bridget Jones comparisons, Fisher's performance alone makes the film worth watching. A small step above the rest of the genre.

Grade: B

7.01.2009

Ice Age 3: Dawn of the Dinosaurs

Directed by: Carlos Saldanha and Mike Thurmeier
Running Time: 1h 34min

This installment of the Ice Age series proves the franchise has overstayed its welcome. The highlight of the films has always been the little squirrel Scrat, and his overzealous quest to secure a nut. These ingenious little cartoon segments work extremely well as advertising fodder and short films, but when the characters are stretched out to feature length, and then sequelled two times over, the material runs rather thin.

Roger Ebert claims this "the best film of the franchise yet". i claim Roger Ebert "well past his prime". He completely missed the mark on this one (and several other films this summer). This is basically The Land Before Time with other prehistoric animals thrown in. i'm actually quite fond of Leguizamo, but his voicing of the character Sid gets very sickening only minutes in. SImon Pegg tries to save the film as a new character Buck, and his inspired work barely manages to make this film worth watching. The 3D doesn't really add anything special to the film, which makes it all the more disappointing. i'm all for more Scrat adventures, (maybe as short films before Fox films), but as for the rest of these characters, banish them to the stone age, please.

Grade: C